REGL vs VYM
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, REGL or VYM?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. REGL led over the full window, VYM over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. REGL is less concentrated, with 16.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | REGL | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $1.8B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.17% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 66 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +9.76% | +14.82%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.54% | +20.84%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.66% | +18.64%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.80% | +12.28%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9% | 13.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.4% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,558 | $17,845Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 16.8%Best | 25.9% |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2015 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 5, 2015 to Sep 4, 2026 (11.6 years).
REGL vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.6 years both funds cover.
REGL vs VYM Performance
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year REGL returned +8.54% while VYM returned +20.84%. Year to date, REGL is up 9.76% versus a gain of 14.82% for VYM.
Over three years, REGL compounded at +12.66% per year against +18.64% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +7.80% and +12.28% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, REGL has the edge at +9.70% annualized vs +9.28%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
REGL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.9% compared with 13.9% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.4% for REGL and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
REGL charges 0.40% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $4 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, REGL currently yields 2.17% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
73.4% of REGL's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 1.5% of VYM's money is in holdings REGL also owns.
Most of REGL is already inside VYM. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
48 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in REGL and 602 in VYM, against full books of 66 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 521 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for REGL (95.7% of the fund), and 16 for REGL that do not appear in VYM (25.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in REGL | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 1.65% | 0.08% | 1.57% |
| SCIService Corp International | 1.67% | 0.04% | 1.63% |
| RPMRpm International Inc. | 1.64% | 0.06% | 1.58% |
| CHEChemed Corp | 1.64% | 0.03% | 1.61% |
| THGHanover Insurance Group Inc | 1.62% | 0.03% | 1.59% |
| DCIDonaldson Co Inc | 1.61% | 0.04% | 1.57% |
| FAFFirst American Financial | 1.61% | 0.03% | 1.58% |
| SEICSei Investments Co. | 1.60% | 0.04% | 1.56% |
| RLIRli Corp | 1.61% | 0.02% | 1.59% |
| ATRAptargroup Inc | 1.60% | 0.03% | 1.57% |
73.4% of REGL is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, REGL or VYM?
REGL has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, REGL or VYM?
Over the past year REGL returned +8.54% vs +20.84% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), REGL annualized +9.70% vs +9.28% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, REGL or VYM?
REGL has been the more volatile fund at 14.9% annualized versus 13.9% for VYM. Worst drawdown: REGL -36.4% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both REGL and VYM?
REGL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between REGL and VYM?
73.4% of REGL's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 1.5% of VYM's is in holdings REGL also owns. They hold 48 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in REGL and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, REGL or VYM?
REGL yields 2.17% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than REGL?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. REGL led over the full window, VYM over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. REGL is less concentrated, with 16.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.