REK vs VOO
ProShares Short Real Estate vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | REK | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $12M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.28% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -7.14% | +12.13% | |
| 1Y Return | -4.23% | +20.36% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -4.80% | +20.90% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.22% | +12.59% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -84.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 16, 2010 | Sep 7, 2010 |
REK vs VOO Performance
ProShares Short Real Estate (REK) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year REK returned -4.23% while VOO returned +20.36%. Year to date, REK is down 7.14% versus a gain of 12.13% for VOO.
Over three years, REK compounded at -4.80% per year against +20.90% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +1.22% and +12.59% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.41% annualized vs -9.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
REK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -84.8% for REK and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.73. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
REK charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, REK currently yields 3.28% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
REK and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, REK or VOO?
REK has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, REK or VOO?
Over the past year REK returned -4.23% vs +20.36% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), REK annualized -9.78% vs +13.41% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, REK or VOO?
REK has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: REK -84.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both REK and VOO?
REK and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between REK and VOO?
REK and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, REK or VOO?
REK yields 3.28% while VOO yields 1.08%, so REK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.