RHRX vs VTI
RH Tactical Rotation ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RHRX delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RHRX | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.38% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $41M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +18.21% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.17% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.92% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -25.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Adaptive ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2012 | May 24, 2001 |
RHRX vs VTI Performance
RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) is a ETF from Adaptive ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RHRX returned +28.17% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, RHRX is up 18.21% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, RHRX compounded at +20.92% per year against +21.83% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, RHRX has the edge at +8.88% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RHRX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.3% for RHRX and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RHRX charges 1.38% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $138 vs $3 annually, a gap of $135 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RHRX currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RHRX and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2792 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RHRX or VTI?
RHRX has an expense ratio of 1.38% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $135 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RHRX or VTI?
Over the past year RHRX returned +28.17% vs +22.35% for VTI, so RHRX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), RHRX annualized +8.88% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RHRX or VTI?
RHRX has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RHRX -25.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RHRX and VTI?
RHRX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between RHRX and VTI?
RHRX and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2792 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RHRX or VTI?
RHRX yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.