RINF vs SPY
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RINF | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $18M | $821.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.63% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +3.44% | +12.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.74% | +20.83% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.08% | +21.70% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.10% | +12.98% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 10, 2012 | Jan 22, 1993 |
RINF vs SPY Performance
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) is a ETF from ProShares and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year RINF returned +4.74% while SPY returned +20.83%. Year to date, RINF is up 3.44% versus a gain of 12.22% for SPY.
Over three years, RINF compounded at +3.08% per year against +21.70% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +6.10% and +12.98% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +8.79% annualized vs +0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 10.3% for RINF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.9% for RINF and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RINF charges 0.30% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $9 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RINF currently yields 3.63% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
RINF and SPY share 0 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RINF or SPY?
RINF has an expense ratio of 0.30% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RINF or SPY?
Over the past year RINF returned +4.74% vs +20.83% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), RINF annualized +0.00% vs +8.79% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RINF or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 10.3% for RINF. Worst drawdown: RINF -50.9% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both RINF and SPY?
RINF and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RINF and SPY?
RINF and SPY share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RINF or SPY?
RINF yields 3.63% while SPY yields 1.01%, so RINF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.