RINF vs VXUS
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RINF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $18M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.69% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +2.50% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.73% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.13% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.43% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 10, 2012 | Jan 26, 2011 |
RINF vs VXUS Performance
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RINF returned +3.73% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, RINF is up 2.50% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, RINF compounded at +3.13% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +5.43% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs -0.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.3% for RINF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.9% for RINF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RINF charges 0.30% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $5 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RINF currently yields 3.69% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
RINF and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RINF or VXUS?
RINF has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $25 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RINF or VXUS?
Over the past year RINF returned +3.73% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), RINF annualized -0.06% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RINF or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.3% for RINF. Worst drawdown: RINF -50.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both RINF and VXUS?
RINF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RINF and VXUS?
RINF and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RINF or VXUS?
RINF yields 3.69% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so RINF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.