RNWZ vs VTI
TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RNWZ or VTI?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RNWZ led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RNWZ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $6M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.24% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 24 | 3,543 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.9% | 13.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.9% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $10,361 | $15,464Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 62.8% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 8, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 469 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. RNWZ has data through Jun 13, 2025 and VTI through Sep 25, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 9, 2022 to Jun 13, 2025 (2.5 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RNWZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.9% compared with 13.5% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.9% for RNWZ and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RNWZ charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RNWZ currently yields 1.24% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
37.7% of RNWZ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.6% of VTI's money is in holdings RNWZ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 92 days apart, RNWZ as of Apr 30, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
9 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in RNWZ and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 24 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,141 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for RNWZ (96.8% of the fund), and 4 for RNWZ that do not appear in VTI (13.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RNWZ | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc | 9.72% | 0.10% | 9.62% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 6.94% | 0.25% | 6.69% |
| HASIHa Sustainable Infrastructure Capital Inc | 6.78% | 0.01% | 6.77% |
| PCGPg&E Corp. | 3.40% | 0.05% | 3.35% |
| ORAOrange - Adr | 2.97% | 0.01% | 2.96% |
| NRGNrg Energy | 2.45% | 0.04% | 2.41% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp | 1.82% | 0.14% | 1.68% |
| BKHBlack Hills Corp | 1.83% | 0.01% | 1.82% |
| OTTROtter Tail Corp. | 1.82% | 0.01% | 1.81% |
37.7% of RNWZ is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RNWZ or VTI?
RNWZ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, RNWZ or VTI?
RNWZ has been the more volatile fund at 19.9% annualized versus 13.5% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RNWZ -24.9% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both RNWZ and VTI?
RNWZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RNWZ and VTI?
37.7% of RNWZ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.6% of VTI's is in holdings RNWZ also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in RNWZ and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, RNWZ or VTI?
RNWZ yields 1.24% while VTI yields 1.03%, so RNWZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RNWZ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RNWZ led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.