RSJN vs SCHD

RSJN vs SCHD

Which is better, RSJN or SCHD?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Value.

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns: SCHD

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRSJNSCHD
Expense Ratio0.85%0.06%Best
AUM$85M$112.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%3.00%
Holdings10103
YTD Return+8.59%+24.59%Best
1Y Return+11.59%+28.14%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+15.58%
5Y Return (annualized)-+9.90%
Volatility (annualized)7.2%Best13.4%
Max Drawdown-12.4%Best-16.1%
$10,000 over 2.2 years$12,333$13,969Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Charles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Value
InceptionJun 21, 2024Oct 20, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 24, 2024 to Sep 10, 2026 (2.2 years).

RSJN vs SCHD growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.

RSJN vs SCHD Performance

FT Vest US Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June (RSJN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year RSJN returned +11.59% while SCHD returned +28.14%. Year to date, RSJN is up 8.59% versus a gain of 24.59% for SCHD.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.4% compared with 7.2% for RSJN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.4% for RSJN and -16.1% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RSJN charges 0.85% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $6 annually, a gap of $79 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSJN currently yields 0.00% against 3.00% for SCHD.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of RSJN and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

RSJNSCHD

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RSJN or SCHD?

RSJN has an expense ratio of 0.85% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $79 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, RSJN or SCHD?

Over the past year RSJN returned +11.59% vs +28.14% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RSJN annualized +10.00% vs +16.41% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, RSJN or SCHD?

SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.4% annualized versus 7.2% for RSJN. Worst drawdown: RSJN -12.4% vs SCHD -16.1%.

Should I hold both RSJN and SCHD?

RSJN and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, RSJN or SCHD?

RSJN yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SCHD better than RSJN?

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.