RSJN vs VYM
FT Vest US Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSJN | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $86M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +10.68% | +14.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.31% | +22.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.1% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
RSJN vs VYM Performance
FT Vest US Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June (RSJN) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSJN returned +14.31% while VYM returned +22.16%. Year to date, RSJN is up 10.68% versus a gain of 14.66% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 7.1% for RSJN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.4% for RSJN and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSJN charges 0.85% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $4 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSJN currently yields 0.00% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
RSJN and VYM share 0 holdings out of 604 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSJN or VYM?
RSJN has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $81 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RSJN or VYM?
Over the past year RSJN returned +14.31% vs +22.16% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RSJN annualized +11.26% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RSJN or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 7.1% for RSJN. Worst drawdown: RSJN -12.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both RSJN and VYM?
RSJN and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between RSJN and VYM?
RSJN and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 604 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSJN or VYM?
RSJN yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.