RSPR vs VTI
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSPR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $100M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.63% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +10.99% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.84% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.48% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.64% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -43.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 12, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
RSPR vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSPR returned +6.84% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, RSPR is up 10.99% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Over three years, RSPR compounded at +7.48% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.64% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs +4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSPR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.2% for RSPR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSPR charges 0.40% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSPR currently yields 1.63% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RSPR and VTI share 26 holdings out of 2792 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSPR or VTI?
RSPR has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RSPR or VTI?
Over the past year RSPR returned +6.84% vs +22.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), RSPR annualized +4.12% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RSPR or VTI?
RSPR has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RSPR -43.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RSPR and VTI?
RSPR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RSPR and VTI?
RSPR and VTI share 26 common holdings with a 1.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2792 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSPR or VTI?
RSPR yields 1.63% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RSPR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.