RSPR vs VTI
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RSPR or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSPR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $97M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.89% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 33 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +0.56% | +11.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | -4.56% | +15.05%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.41% | +22.32%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.95% | +12.50%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -43.2% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,534 | $18,020Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.7% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 12, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 14, 2015 to Sep 30, 2026 (11.1 years).
RSPR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.1 years both funds cover.
RSPR vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSPR returned -4.56% while VTI returned +15.05%. Year to date, RSPR is up 0.56% versus a gain of 11.95% for VTI.
Over three years, RSPR compounded at +6.41% per year against +22.32% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -0.95% and +12.50% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.57% annualized vs +3.16%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSPR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 15.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.2% for RSPR and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSPR charges 0.40% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSPR currently yields 2.89% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
100.0% of RSPR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.7% of VTI's money is in holdings RSPR also owns.
Most of RSPR is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
30 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in RSPR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 33 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 30 and 3,463 positions we hold weights for.
VTI holds 1,120 positions RSPR does not, 95.8% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 6.40%, AAPL 6.29%, MSFT 4.79%, AMZN 3.65%, GOOGL 2.90%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RSPR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WELLWelltower, Inc. | 3.85% | 0.23% | 3.62% |
| CBRECbre Services Inc | 3.75% | 0.06% | 3.69% |
| VTRVentas Inc . | 3.72% | 0.06% | 3.66% |
| EQIXEquinix Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust | 3.49% | 0.14% | 3.35% |
| DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc. | 3.54% | 0.09% | 3.45% |
| BXPBoston Properties Inc | 3.58% | 0.02% | 3.56% |
| SPGSimon Property Group Inc | 3.44% | 0.10% | 3.34% |
| DOCHealthpeak Properties Inc | 3.51% | 0.02% | 3.49% |
| ORealty Income Corp. | 3.42% | 0.08% | 3.34% |
| PLDPrologis Inc | 3.31% | 0.19% | 3.12% |
100.0% of RSPR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSPR or VTI?
RSPR has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RSPR or VTI?
Over the past year RSPR returned -4.56% vs +15.05% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), RSPR annualized +3.16% vs +12.57% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RSPR or VTI?
RSPR has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 15.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RSPR -43.2% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both RSPR and VTI?
RSPR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RSPR and VTI?
100.0% of RSPR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.7% of VTI's is in holdings RSPR also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in RSPR and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSPR or VTI?
RSPR yields 2.89% while VTI yields 1.03%, so RSPR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RSPR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.