RSST vs VTI
Return Stacked US Stocks & Managed Futures ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RSST delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSST | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $508M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.25% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 35 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +16.52% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.11% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.66% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Return Stacked ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 6, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
RSST vs VTI Performance
Return Stacked US Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) is a ETF from Return Stacked ETF and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSST returned +39.11% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, RSST is up 16.52% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, RSST compounded at +18.66% per year against +21.54% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, RSST has the edge at +18.66% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSST has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.8% for RSST and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSST charges 0.99% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSST currently yields 0.25% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RSST and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSST or VTI?
RSST has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RSST or VTI?
Over the past year RSST returned +39.11% vs +21.39% for VTI, so RSST leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), RSST annualized +18.66% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RSST or VTI?
RSST has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RSST -30.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RSST and VTI?
RSST and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RSST and VTI?
RSST and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSST or VTI?
RSST yields 0.25% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.