RSST vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. RSST delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: RSSTMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRSSTVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.99%0.03%
AUM$482M$979.0B
Dividend Yield0.25%1.09%
Holdings30509
YTD Return+18.59%+13.72%
1Y Return+40.99%+21.63%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.52%+21.55%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.26%
Volatility (annualized)17.6%14.1%
Max Drawdown-30.8%-34.3%
Fund FamilyReturn Stacked ETFVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionSep 6, 2023Sep 7, 2010

RSST vs VOO Performance

Return Stacked US Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) is a ETF from Return Stacked ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSST returned +40.99% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, RSST is up 18.59% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.

Over three years, RSST compounded at +19.52% per year against +21.55% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, RSST has the edge at +19.52% annualized vs +13.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RSST has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.8% for RSST and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RSST charges 0.99% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSST currently yields 0.25% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

0.0%overlap

RSST and VOO share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RSST or VOO?

RSST has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.

Which performed better, RSST or VOO?

Over the past year RSST returned +40.99% vs +21.63% for VOO, so RSST leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), RSST annualized +19.52% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, RSST or VOO?

RSST has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RSST -30.8% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both RSST and VOO?

RSST and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between RSST and VOO?

RSST and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, RSST or VOO?

RSST yields 0.25% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.