RTOO vs VOO
VistaShares Robotics Supercycle ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, RTOO or VOO?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RTOO is less concentrated, with 32.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RTOO | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 61 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -4.54% | +13.21%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.37% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.66% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.14% |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.0%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | VistaShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 15, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
RTOO vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
RTOO vs VOO Performance
VistaShares Robotics Supercycle ETF (RTOO) is an ETF from VistaShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, RTOO is down 4.54% versus a gain of 13.21% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RTOO charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RTOO currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
5.8% of RTOO's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 7.7% of VOO's money is in holdings RTOO also owns.
VOO and RTOO share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 59 positions we hold weights for in RTOO and 494 in VOO, against full books of 61 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 484 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for RTOO (91.4% of the fund), and 9 for RTOO that do not appear in VOO (11.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RTOO and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RTOO or VOO?
RTOO has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between RTOO and VOO?
7.7% of VOO's money is in holdings RTOO also owns. 7.7% of VOO's is in holdings RTOO also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 59 positions we hold weights for in RTOO and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, RTOO or VOO?
RTOO yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than RTOO?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RTOO is less concentrated, with 32.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.