RTOO vs VTI

RTOO vs VTI

Which is better, RTOO or VTI?

Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. RTOO is less concentrated, with 32.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: RTOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRTOOVTI
Expense Ratio0.75%0.03%Best
AUM$4M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings613,543
YTD Return-4.54%+13.10%Best
1Y Return-+17.01%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.26%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.98%
Top 10 Weight32.0%Best33.3%
Fund FamilyVistaSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 15, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

RTOO vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

RTOO vs VTI Performance

VistaShares Robotics Supercycle ETF (RTOO) is an ETF from VistaShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, RTOO is down 4.54% versus a gain of 13.10% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RTOO charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RTOO currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

RTOO already in VTI17.1%
VTI already in RTOO6.6%

17.1% of RTOO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 6.6% of VTI's money is in holdings RTOO also owns.

RTOO and VTI share little of their money.

11 positions in common, counted across the 59 positions we hold weights for in RTOO and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 61 and 3,543.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,143 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for RTOO (90.8% of the fund), and 1 for RTOO that do not appear in VTI (0.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RTOOWeight in VTIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp0.86%6.40%5.54%
NOVTNovanta Inc. Common Stock3.18%0.01%3.17%
ROKRockwell Automation2.88%0.07%2.81%
TERTeradyne Inc - Common2.03%0.08%1.95%
CGNXCognex Corp - Common2.03%0.02%2.01%
LECOLincoln Electric Holdings Inc1.73%0.02%1.71%
VPGVishay Precision Group Inc1.25%0.00%1.25%
SYMSymbotic Inc Class A1.25%0.00%1.25%
AMBAAmbarella, Inc.0.77%0.00%0.77%
MPMp Materials Corp0.58%0.01%0.57%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of RTOO and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

RTOOVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RTOO or VTI?

RTOO has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between RTOO and VTI?

17.1% of RTOO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 6.6% of VTI's is in holdings RTOO also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 59 positions we hold weights for in RTOO and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, RTOO or VTI?

RTOO yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than RTOO?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. RTOO is less concentrated, with 32.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.