RUSC vs VTI

RUSC vs VTI

Which is better, RUSC or VTI?

Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. RUSC led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: RUSC

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRUSCVTI
Expense Ratio0.64%0.03%Best
AUM$81M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.32%1.07%
Holdings4903,543
YTD Return+21.07%Best+12.95%
1Y Return+25.02%Best+19.17%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.86%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.72%
Volatility (annualized)14.3%11.7%Best
Max Drawdown-9.2%-8.9%Best
$10,000 over 1.3 years$14,245Best$13,184
Fund FamilyRussell InvestmentsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleSmall Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 13, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 14, 2025 to Sep 8, 2026 (1.3 years).

RUSC vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.

RUSC vs VTI Performance

Russell Investments US Small Cap Equity ETF (RUSC) is an ETF from Russell Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RUSC returned +25.02% while VTI returned +19.17%. Year to date, RUSC is up 21.07% versus a gain of 12.95% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RUSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 11.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.2% for RUSC and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RUSC charges 0.64% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $64 vs $3 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RUSC currently yields 0.32% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

RUSC already in VTI56.3%

At least 56.3% of RUSC's money is in holdings VTI also owns.

Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

The two holdings books were reported 51 days apart, RUSC as of Aug 20, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

283 positions in common, counted across the 489 positions we hold weights for in RUSC and 2,788 in VTI, against full books of 490 and 3,543.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RUSCWeight in VTIDifference
UTZUtz Brands Inc Class A0.50%0.00%0.50%
CDNACaredx Inc0.47%0.00%0.47%
ARTNAArtesian Resources Corporation0.46%0.00%0.46%
BBIOBridgebio Pharma Inc0.44%0.02%0.42%
OCFCOceanfirst Financial Corp Common Stock Usd 0.010.45%0.00%0.45%
RYNRayonier Inc - Common0.44%0.00%0.44%
CXTCrane Nxt Co0.44%0.00%0.44%
PDFSPdf Solutions0.41%0.00%0.41%
TVTXTravere Therapeutics Inc0.41%0.00%0.41%
UVEUniversal Insurance Holdings Inc0.41%0.00%0.41%

56.3% of RUSC is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

RUSCVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RUSC or VTI?

RUSC has an expense ratio of 0.64% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, RUSC or VTI?

Over the past year RUSC returned +25.02% vs +19.17% for VTI, so RUSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), RUSC annualized +31.28% vs +23.69% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, RUSC or VTI?

RUSC has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 11.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RUSC -9.2% vs VTI -8.9%.

Should I hold both RUSC and VTI?

RUSC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between RUSC and VTI?

At least 56.3% of RUSC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 283 positions in common, counted across the 489 positions we hold weights for in RUSC and 2,788 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, RUSC or VTI?

RUSC yields 0.32% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than RUSC?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. RUSC led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.