RWEM vs VTI
Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RWEM or VTI?
RWEM has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RWEM led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RWEM | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $74M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.76% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 244 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +20.74%Best | +12.28% |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.78% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.89% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.94% |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.0% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | The Advisors Inner Circle Fund | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
RWEM vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
RWEM vs VTI Performance
Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (RWEM) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, RWEM is up 20.74% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RWEM charges 0.52% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $3 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RWEM currently yields 1.76% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 222 holdings in RWEM and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 98.6% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 222 positions we hold weights for in RWEM and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 244 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for RWEM (97.5% of the fund), and 3 for RWEM that do not appear in VTI (0.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RWEM and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RWEM or VTI?
RWEM has an expense ratio of 0.52% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $49 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, RWEM or VTI?
RWEM yields 1.76% while VTI yields 1.03%, so RWEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RWEM?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RWEM led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.