RYSE vs VOO
Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, RYSE or VOO?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RYSE | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.94% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.97% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 4 | 509 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.9% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $12,110 | $15,982Best |
| Fund Family | CBOE Vest | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 175 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. RYSE has data through Mar 27, 2026 and VOO through Sep 18, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 3, 2023 to Mar 27, 2026 (3.1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RYSE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 12.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.9% for RYSE and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.40. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RYSE charges 0.94% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $94 vs $3 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RYSE currently yields 1.97% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in RYSE and 494 in VOO, totalling 75.0% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 182 days apart, RYSE as of Jan 30, 2026 and VOO as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in RYSE and 494 in VOO, against full books of 4 and 509.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RYSE and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RYSE or VOO?
RYSE has an expense ratio of 0.94% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $91 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, RYSE or VOO?
RYSE has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 12.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RYSE -19.9% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both RYSE and VOO?
RYSE and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.40, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, RYSE or VOO?
RYSE yields 1.97% while VOO yields 1.04%, so RYSE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than RYSE?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.