RYSE vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRYSEVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.94%0.03%
AUM$2M$979.0B
Dividend Yield1.97%1.09%
Holdings4509
YTD Return+2.28%+13.79%
1Y Return+2.19%+23.01%
3Y Return (annualized)+6.15%+21.78%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.39%
Volatility (annualized)15.8%14.1%
Max Drawdown-19.9%-34.3%
Fund FamilyCBOE VestVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionFeb 3, 2023Sep 7, 2010

RYSE vs VOO Performance

Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RYSE) is a ETF from CBOE Vest and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RYSE returned +2.19% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, RYSE is up 2.28% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.

Over three years, RYSE compounded at +6.15% per year against +21.78% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RYSE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.9% for RYSE and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.40. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RYSE charges 0.94% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $94 vs $3 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RYSE currently yields 1.97% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

0.0%overlap

RYSE and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RYSE or VOO?

RYSE has an expense ratio of 0.94% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.

Which performed better, RYSE or VOO?

Over the past year RYSE returned +2.19% vs +23.01% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), RYSE annualized +6.37% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, RYSE or VOO?

RYSE has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RYSE -19.9% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both RYSE and VOO?

RYSE and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.40, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between RYSE and VOO?

RYSE and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, RYSE or VOO?

RYSE yields 1.97% while VOO yields 1.09%, so RYSE currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.