SBTU vs VTI
T-REX 2x Long SBET Daily Target ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SBTU or VTI?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SBTU | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $3M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,542 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1724.0% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -94.2% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $9,490 | $11,298Best |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 8 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. SBTU has data through Nov 3, 2026 and VTI through Nov 11, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 21, 2025 to Nov 3, 2026 (1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SBTU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 1724.0% compared with 12.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.2% for SBTU and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.15. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SBTU charges 1.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SBTU currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in SBTU and 3,464 in VTI, totalling 2.2% and 97.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in SBTU and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 6 and 3,542.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SBTU and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SBTU or VTI?
SBTU has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $147 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, SBTU or VTI?
SBTU has been the more volatile fund at 1724.0% annualized versus 12.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SBTU -94.2% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both SBTU and VTI?
SBTU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.15, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SBTU or VTI?
SBTU yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SBTU?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.