SBTU vs VOO
T-REX 2x Long SBET Daily Target ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SBTU or VOO?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SBTU led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SBTU | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 3 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +436.11%Best | +12.37% |
| 1Y Return | +103.67%Best | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.49% |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
SBTU vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SBTU vs VOO Performance
T-REX 2x Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU) is an ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SBTU returned +103.67% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, SBTU is up 436.11% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SBTU charges 1.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SBTU currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in SBTU and 494 in VOO, totalling 2.4% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in SBTU and 494 in VOO, against full books of 3 and 509.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SBTU and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SBTU or VOO?
SBTU has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $147 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SBTU or VOO?
Over the past year SBTU returned +103.67% vs +16.61% for VOO, so SBTU leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SBTU or VOO?
SBTU yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SBTU?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SBTU led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.