SCA vs SPY
GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCA | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $990,388.57 | $821.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.73% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 0 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +8.23% | +12.93% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.00% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 27, 2026 | Jan 22, 1993 |
SCA vs SPY Performance
GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF (SCA) is a ETF from GraniteShares and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Year to date, SCA is up 8.23% versus a gain of 12.93% for SPY.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.4% for SCA and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCA charges 1.07% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $9 annually, a gap of $98 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCA currently yields 7.73% against 1.01% for SPY.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCA or SPY?
SCA has an expense ratio of 1.07% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $98 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCA or SPY?
SCA yields 7.73% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SCA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.