SCA vs VOO
GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCA | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $990,388.57 | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.73% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 0 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +9.63% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 27, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SCA vs VOO Performance
GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF (SCA) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, SCA is up 9.63% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.4% for SCA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCA charges 1.07% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCA currently yields 7.73% against 1.08% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCA or VOO?
SCA has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $104 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCA or VOO?
SCA yields 7.73% while VOO yields 1.08%, so SCA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.