QQQ vs SCA
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SCA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 1.07% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $990,388.57 | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 7.73% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 0 | |
| YTD Return | +17.07% | +7.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.39% | - | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.18% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | - | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -27.4% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | GraniteShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | May 27, 2026 |
QQQ vs SCA Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF (SCA) is a ETF from GraniteShares. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.07% versus a gain of 7.68% for SCA.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -27.4% for SCA. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SCA charges 1.07%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $107 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 7.73% for SCA.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SCA?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SCA charges 1.07%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $89 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SCA?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SCA yields 7.73%, so SCA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.