SCC vs VTI
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Discretionary vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $7M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.53% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -2.47% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | -7.91% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -23.18% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -15.72% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 34.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
SCC vs VTI Performance
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Discretionary (SCC) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCC returned -7.91% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, SCC is down 2.47% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, SCC compounded at -23.18% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -15.72% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs -27.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.1% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.9% for SCC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.87. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCC charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCC currently yields 3.53% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCC or VTI?
SCC has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCC or VTI?
Over the past year SCC returned -7.91% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), SCC annualized -27.57% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCC or VTI?
SCC has been the more volatile fund at 34.1% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SCC -99.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SCC and VTI?
SCC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCC or VTI?
SCC yields 3.53% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.