SCC vs VOO
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Discretionary vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCC | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $7M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.53% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -5.02% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -15.42% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -23.22% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -16.27% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 34.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SCC vs VOO Performance
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Discretionary (SCC) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCC returned -15.42% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, SCC is down 5.02% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, SCC compounded at -23.22% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -16.27% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs -27.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.9% for SCC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.88. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCC charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCC currently yields 3.53% against 1.09% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCC or VOO?
SCC has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCC or VOO?
Over the past year SCC returned -15.42% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), SCC annualized -27.69% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCC or VOO?
SCC has been the more volatile fund at 34.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SCC -99.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SCC and VOO?
SCC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCC or VOO?
SCC yields 3.53% while VOO yields 1.09%, so SCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.