SCDS vs VTI
SCDS vs VTI
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SCDS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCDS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $9M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.99% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 266 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +28.54% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +43.34% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -26.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 7, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
SCDS vs VTI Performance
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCDS returned +43.34% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, SCDS is up 28.54% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCDS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.7% for SCDS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCDS charges 0.40% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCDS currently yields 0.99% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SCDS and VTI share 203 holdings out of 2853 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCDS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| RHP | 1.03% | 0.01% | 1.02% |
| MOG.A | 0.98% | 0.02% | 0.96% |
| AZZ | 0.94% | 0.00% | 0.94% |
| CHEF | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| WSFS | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MYRG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| LTH | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| KN | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| FFBC | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| KRG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings SCDS shares with VTI Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCDS or VTI?
SCDS has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCDS or VTI?
Over the past year SCDS returned +43.34% vs +24.16% for VTI, so SCDS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SCDS annualized +24.30% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCDS or VTI?
SCDS has been the more volatile fund at 17.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SCDS -26.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SCDS and VTI?
SCDS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SCDS and VTI?
SCDS and VTI share 203 common holdings with a 0.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2853 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCDS or VTI?
SCDS yields 0.99% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.