SILJ vs VOO
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SILJ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SILJ | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.2B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.14% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 65 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +7.25% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +75.92% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +47.26% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +17.34% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 47.8% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -79.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 28, 2012 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SILJ vs VOO Performance
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SILJ returned +75.92% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, SILJ is up 7.25% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, SILJ compounded at +47.26% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +17.34% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +3.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SILJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 47.8% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.0% for SILJ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SILJ charges 0.69% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $3 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SILJ currently yields 2.14% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SILJ and VOO share 0 holdings out of 572 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SILJ or VOO?
SILJ has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SILJ or VOO?
Over the past year SILJ returned +75.92% vs +22.02% for VOO, so SILJ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), SILJ annualized +3.47% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SILJ or VOO?
SILJ has been the more volatile fund at 47.8% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SILJ -79.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SILJ and VOO?
SILJ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SILJ and VOO?
SILJ and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 572 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SILJ or VOO?
SILJ yields 2.14% while VOO yields 1.09%, so SILJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.