QQQ vs SILJ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. SILJ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SILJ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.69% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $3.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 2.30% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 69 | |
| YTD Return | +17.07% | +14.46% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.39% | +96.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.08% | +52.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.18% | +21.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 48.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -79.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Amplify ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Nov 28, 2012 |
QQQ vs SILJ Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.39% while SILJ returned +96.87%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.07% versus a gain of 14.46% for SILJ.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +26.08% per year against +52.75% for SILJ; over five years the annualized figures are +15.18% and +21.36% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.05% annualized vs +3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SILJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 48.1% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -79.0% for SILJ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SILJ charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $69 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 2.30% for SILJ.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and SILJ share 0 holdings out of 169 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SILJ?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SILJ charges 0.69%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or SILJ?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.39% vs +96.87% for SILJ, so SILJ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), QQQ annualized +13.05% vs +3.96% for SILJ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SILJ?
SILJ has been the more volatile fund at 48.1% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs SILJ -79.0%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SILJ?
QQQ and SILJ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SILJ?
QQQ and SILJ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 169 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SILJ?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SILJ yields 2.30%, so SILJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.