SNK vs VOO
GraniteShares 2x Short SpaceX Daily ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SNK or VOO?
Trading-Inverse Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SNK | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.20% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $62M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 4 | 506 |
| YTD Return | -6.30% | +13.12%Best |
| 1Y Return | -6.30% | +15.48%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.68% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.77% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 98.6% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -71.8% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 16.1 years | $14,308 | $75,301Best |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 15, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 16.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 13, 2010 to Oct 19, 2026 (16.1 years).
SNK vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.1 years both funds cover.
SNK vs VOO Performance
GraniteShares 2x Short SpaceX Daily ETF (SNK) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SNK returned -6.30% while VOO returned +15.48%. Year to date, SNK is down 6.30% versus a gain of 13.12% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SNK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 98.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -71.8% for SNK and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.02. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SNK charges 2.20% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $220 vs $3 annually, a gap of $217 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SNK currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VOO.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SNK and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SNK or VOO?
SNK has an expense ratio of 2.20% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $217 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SNK or VOO?
Over the past year SNK returned -6.30% vs +15.48% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), SNK annualized +2.25% vs +13.36% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SNK or VOO?
SNK has been the more volatile fund at 98.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SNK -71.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SNK and VOO?
SNK and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.02, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SNK or VOO?
SNK yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.06%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SNK?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.