SCHD vs STK

SCHD vs STK

Which is better, SCHD or STK?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. STK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. STK is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns: STKLess Concentrated: STK

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSCHDSTK
Expense Ratio0.06%Best1.13%
AUM$112.1B$831M
Dividend Yield3.00%3.36%
Holdings10375
YTD Return+21.99%+48.75%Best
1Y Return+25.92%+61.27%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+15.66%+38.10%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+9.48%+20.88%Best
Volatility (annualized)13.7%Best23.6%
Max Drawdown-33.4%Best-42.8%
$10,000 over 5 years$15,728$25,809Best
Top 10 Weight41.8%41.5%Best
Fund FamilyCharles Schwab Asset ManagementColumbia Threadneedle Investments
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Growth
InceptionOct 20, 2011Nov 25, 2009

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2011 to Sep 23, 2026 (14.9 years).

SCHD vs STK growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.9 years both funds cover.

SCHD vs STK Performance

Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund (STK) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Over the past year SCHD returned +25.92% while STK returned +61.27%. Year to date, SCHD is up 21.99% versus a gain of 48.75% for STK.

Over three years, SCHD compounded at +15.66% per year against +38.10% for STK; over five years the annualized figures are +9.48% and +20.88% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, STK has the edge at +12.21% annualized vs +11.15%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

STK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.6% compared with 13.7% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -42.8% for STK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SCHD charges 0.06% per year while STK charges 1.13%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $113 annually, a gap of $107 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.00% against 3.36% for STK.

Holdings Overlap

SCHD already in STK2.5%
STK already in SCHD0.9%

2.5% of SCHD's money is in holdings STK also owns. 0.9% of STK's money is in holdings SCHD also owns.

SCHD and STK share little of their money.

1 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 62 in STK, against full books of 103 and 75.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 57 positions for STK that do not appear in our book for SCHD (91.2% of the fund), and 98 for SCHD that do not appear in STK (97.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SCHDWeight in STKDifference
QCOMQualcomm Inc.2.52%0.88%1.64%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of SCHD and STK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

SCHDSTK

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SCHD or STK?

SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while STK charges 1.13%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $107 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, SCHD or STK?

Over the past year SCHD returned +25.92% vs +61.27% for STK, so STK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SCHD annualized +11.15% vs +12.21% for STK. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, SCHD or STK?

STK has been the more volatile fund at 23.6% annualized versus 13.7% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -33.4% vs STK -42.8%.

Should I hold both SCHD and STK?

SCHD and STK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and STK?

2.5% of SCHD's money is in holdings STK also owns. 0.9% of STK's is in holdings SCHD also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 62 in STK.

Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or STK?

SCHD yields 3.00% while STK yields 3.36%, so STK currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is STK better than SCHD?

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. STK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. STK is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.