STK vs VXUS
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. STK delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | STK | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.13% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $831M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.29% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 75 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +43.39% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +80.07% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +32.49% | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +20.04% | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 25, 2009 | Jan 26, 2011 |
STK vs VXUS Performance
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund (STK) is a ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year STK returned +80.07% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, STK is up 43.39% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Over three years, STK compounded at +32.49% per year against +19.53% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +20.04% and +9.03% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, STK has the edge at +9.27% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
STK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.9% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.8% for STK and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
STK charges 1.13% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $113 vs $5 annually, a gap of $108 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, STK currently yields 3.29% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, STK or VXUS?
STK has an expense ratio of 1.13% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $108 per year of difference.
Which performed better, STK or VXUS?
Over the past year STK returned +80.07% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so STK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), STK annualized +9.27% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, STK or VXUS?
STK has been the more volatile fund at 22.9% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: STK -42.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both STK and VXUS?
STK and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between STK and VXUS?
STK and VXUS share 2 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7918 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, STK or VXUS?
STK yields 3.29% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so STK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.