SCHD vs SUPP
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF
Which is better, SCHD or SUPP?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and 3Y, SUPP over the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | SUPP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $112.2B | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.13% | 0.32% |
| Holdings | 103 | 30 |
| YTD Return | +27.56%Best | +11.36% |
| 1Y Return | +30.29%Best | +15.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.37%Best | +15.49% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.23% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.1%Best | 19.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.1%Best | -25.3% |
| $10,000 over 3.5 years | $15,367 | $15,887Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.5%Best | 60.2% |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | TCW ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Feb 14, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 16, 2023 to Sep 4, 2026 (3.5 years).
SCHD vs SUPP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.5 years both funds cover.
SCHD vs SUPP Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) is an ETF from TCW ETFs. Over the past year SCHD returned +30.29% while SUPP returned +15.92%. Year to date, SCHD is up 27.56% versus a gain of 11.36% for SUPP.
Over three years, SCHD compounded at +16.37% per year against +15.49% for SUPP. Across the full 4-year window we track, SUPP has the edge at +14.14% annualized vs +13.06%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SUPP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 13.1% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.1% for SCHD and -25.3% for SUPP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while SUPP charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $75 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.13% against 0.32% for SUPP.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 100 holdings in SCHD and 27 in SUPP, totalling 100.0% and 98.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 27 in SUPP, against full books of 103 and 30.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 21 positions for SUPP that do not appear in our book for SCHD (76.4% of the fund), and 99 for SCHD that do not appear in SUPP (99.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCHD and SUPP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or SUPP?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while SUPP charges 0.75%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $69 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCHD or SUPP?
Over the past year SCHD returned +30.29% vs +15.92% for SUPP, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SCHD annualized +13.06% vs +14.14% for SUPP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCHD or SUPP?
SUPP has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 13.1% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -16.1% vs SUPP -25.3%.
Should I hold both SCHD and SUPP?
SCHD and SUPP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or SUPP?
SCHD yields 3.13% while SUPP yields 0.32%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SUPP better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and 3Y, SUPP over the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.