SUPP vs VOO
TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SUPP or VOO?
VOO has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SUPP | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $12M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.32% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 30 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +11.36% | +13.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.92% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.49% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.89% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.2% | 12.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.3% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.5 years | $15,887 | $19,600Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 60.2% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | TCW ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 14, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 16, 2023 to Sep 4, 2026 (3.5 years).
SUPP vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.5 years both funds cover.
SUPP vs VOO Performance
TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) is an ETF from TCW ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SUPP returned +15.92% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, SUPP is up 11.36% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Over three years, SUPP compounded at +15.49% per year against +21.29% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +21.20% annualized vs +14.14%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SUPP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 12.3% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.3% for SUPP and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SUPP charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SUPP currently yields 0.32% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
51.0% of SUPP's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 16.4% of VOO's money is in holdings SUPP also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, SUPP as of Aug 17, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
13 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in SUPP and 505 in VOO, against full books of 30 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 484 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SUPP (83.1% of the fund), and 8 for SUPP that do not appear in VOO (25.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SUPP | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 8.15% | 7.51% | 0.64% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.14% | 3.62% | 1.52% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 6.03% | 0.84% | 5.19% |
| ETNEaton Corp Plc | 6.55% | 0.26% | 6.29% |
| TDGTransdigm Group Inc. | 5.52% | 0.12% | 5.40% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.08% | 2.77% | 0.69% |
| TTTrane Technologies PLC|125 | 3.99% | 0.17% | 3.82% |
| MLMMartin Marietta Materials Inc. | 4.04% | 0.05% | 3.99% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 2.31% | 0.76% | 1.55% |
| CSXCsx Corp. | 2.17% | 0.14% | 2.03% |
51.0% of SUPP is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SUPP or VOO?
SUPP has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SUPP or VOO?
Over the past year SUPP returned +15.92% vs +20.08% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SUPP annualized +14.14% vs +21.20% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SUPP or VOO?
SUPP has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 12.3% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SUPP -25.3% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both SUPP and VOO?
SUPP and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SUPP and VOO?
51.0% of SUPP's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 16.4% of VOO's is in holdings SUPP also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in SUPP and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, SUPP or VOO?
SUPP yields 0.32% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SUPP?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.