SUPP vs VTI
TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SUPP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $13M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.32% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.51% | +13.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.77% | +21.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.33% | +21.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -25.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | TCW ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 14, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
SUPP vs VTI Performance
TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) is a ETF from TCW ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SUPP returned +17.77% while VTI returned +21.12%. Year to date, SUPP is up 14.51% versus a gain of 13.38% for VTI.
Over three years, SUPP compounded at +17.33% per year against +21.85% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, SUPP has the edge at +15.25% annualized vs +8.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SUPP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.3% for SUPP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SUPP charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SUPP currently yields 0.32% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SUPP and VTI share 21 holdings out of 2795 unique holdings combined, representing a 14.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SUPP or VTI?
SUPP has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SUPP or VTI?
Over the past year SUPP returned +17.77% vs +21.12% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SUPP annualized +15.25% vs +8.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SUPP or VTI?
SUPP has been the more volatile fund at 19.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SUPP -25.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SUPP and VTI?
SUPP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SUPP and VTI?
SUPP and VTI share 21 common holdings with a 14.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2795 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SUPP or VTI?
SUPP yields 0.32% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.