IVV vs SUPP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF
Which is better, IVV or SUPP?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SUPP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.32% |
| Holdings | 508 | 30 |
| YTD Return | +13.39%Best | +11.36% |
| 1Y Return | +20.08%Best | +15.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.29%Best | +15.49% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3%Best | 19.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -25.3% |
| $10,000 over 3.5 years | $19,600Best | $15,887 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 60.2% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | TCW ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 14, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 16, 2023 to Sep 4, 2026 (3.5 years).
IVV vs SUPP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.5 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SUPP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) is an ETF from TCW ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% while SUPP returned +15.92%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.39% versus a gain of 11.36% for SUPP.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.29% per year against +15.49% for SUPP. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +21.20% annualized vs +14.14%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SUPP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 12.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -25.3% for SUPP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SUPP charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.32% for SUPP.
Holdings Overlap
16.9% of IVV's money is in holdings SUPP also owns. 45.9% of SUPP's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
13 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 27 in SUPP, against full books of 508 and 30.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 8 positions for SUPP that do not appear in our book for IVV (30.4% of the fund), and 484 for IVV that do not appear in SUPP (82.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SUPP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.98% | 8.15% | 0.17% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.01% | 5.14% | 1.13% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 0.58% | 6.03% | 5.45% |
| TDGTransdigm Group Inc. | 0.11% | 5.52% | 5.41% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.98% | 2.08% | 0.90% |
| TTTrane Technologies PLC|125 | 0.16% | 3.99% | 3.83% |
| MLMMartin Marietta Materials Inc. | 0.05% | 4.04% | 3.99% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.60% | 2.31% | 1.71% |
| CSXCsx Corp. | 0.14% | 2.17% | 2.03% |
| PTCPtc Inc | 0.02% | 2.01% | 1.99% |
45.9% of SUPP is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SUPP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SUPP charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SUPP?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% vs +15.92% for SUPP, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +21.20% vs +14.14% for SUPP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SUPP?
SUPP has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 12.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs SUPP -25.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and SUPP?
IVV and SUPP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SUPP?
45.9% of SUPP's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 45.9% of SUPP's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 27 in SUPP.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SUPP?
IVV yields 1.10% while SUPP yields 0.32%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SUPP better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.