SCHD vs UBIQ
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs AAM Ubiquitous ETF
Which is better, SCHD or UBIQ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | UBIQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $124.4B | $48M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.96% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 102 | 25 |
| YTD Return | +33.46%Best | +5.20% |
| 1Y Return | +37.35% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.54% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.35% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.3%Best | 55.4% |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Oct 5, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
SCHD vs UBIQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SCHD vs UBIQ Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and AAM Ubiquitous ETF (UBIQ) is an ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.. Year to date, SCHD is up 33.46% versus a gain of 5.20% for UBIQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while UBIQ charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $49 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 2.96% against 0.00% for UBIQ.
Holdings Overlap
7.4% of SCHD's money is in holdings UBIQ also owns. 11.6% of UBIQ's money is in holdings SCHD also owns.
UBIQ and SCHD share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 24 in UBIQ, against full books of 102 and 25.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 20 positions for UBIQ that do not appear in our book for SCHD (83.9% of the fund), and 93 for SCHD that do not appear in UBIQ (87.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCHD and UBIQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or UBIQ?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while UBIQ charges 0.49%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and UBIQ?
11.6% of UBIQ's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 11.6% of UBIQ's is in holdings SCHD also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 24 in UBIQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or UBIQ?
SCHD yields 2.96% while UBIQ yields 0.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is UBIQ better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.