UBIQ vs VOO

UBIQ vs VOO

Which is better, UBIQ or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.4%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricUBIQVOO
Expense Ratio0.49%0.03%Best
AUM$48M$1.0T
Dividend Yield0.00%1.05%
Holdings25519
YTD Return+5.20%+11.31%Best
1Y Return-+13.49%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.46%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.61%
Top 10 Weight55.4%39.1%Best
Fund FamilyAdvisors Asset Management, Inc.Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 5, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

UBIQ vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

UBIQ vs VOO Performance

AAM Ubiquitous ETF (UBIQ) is an ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, UBIQ is up 5.20% versus a gain of 11.31% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

UBIQ charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UBIQ currently yields 0.00% against 1.05% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

UBIQ already in VOO95.4%
VOO already in UBIQ29.4%

95.4% of UBIQ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 29.4% of VOO's money is in holdings UBIQ also owns.

Most of UBIQ is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

22 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in UBIQ and 506 in VOO, against full books of 25 and 519.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 479 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for UBIQ (70.5% of the fund), and 1 for UBIQ that do not appear in VOO (0.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in UBIQWeight in VOODifference
AAPLApple, Inc7.49%7.38%0.11%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc10.51%3.71%6.80%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 375.57%5.78%0.21%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc4.09%3.07%1.02%
GOOGAlphabet Inc4.09%2.45%1.64%
VVisa Inc4.70%0.91%3.79%
MAMastercard Inc4.76%0.68%4.08%
WMTWalmart, Inc.4.55%0.70%3.85%
METAMeta Platform Inc2.76%2.43%0.33%
COSTCostco Wholesale Corp.4.24%0.61%3.63%

95.4% of UBIQ is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

UBIQVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, UBIQ or VOO?

UBIQ has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between UBIQ and VOO?

95.4% of UBIQ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 29.4% of VOO's is in holdings UBIQ also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in UBIQ and 506 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, UBIQ or VOO?

UBIQ yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.05%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than UBIQ?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.