QQQ vs UBIQ

QQQ vs UBIQ

Which is better, QQQ or UBIQ?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.4%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQUBIQ
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.49%
AUM$476.0B$48M
Dividend Yield0.43%0.00%
Holdings31225
YTD Return+11.27%Best+5.20%
1Y Return+12.28%-
3Y Return (annualized)+21.54%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.18%-
Top 10 Weight46.5%Best55.4%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 10, 1999Oct 5, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QQQ vs UBIQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QQQ vs UBIQ Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and AAM Ubiquitous ETF (UBIQ) is an ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.. Year to date, QQQ is up 11.27% versus a gain of 5.20% for UBIQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while UBIQ charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $49 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.43% against 0.00% for UBIQ.

Holdings Overlap

QQQ already in UBIQ33.8%
UBIQ already in QQQ57.9%

33.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings UBIQ also owns. 57.9% of UBIQ's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

12 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 24 in UBIQ, against full books of 312 and 25.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 12 positions for UBIQ that do not appear in our book for QQQ (42.1% of the fund), and 83 for QQQ that do not appear in UBIQ (64.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQWeight in UBIQDifference
AAPLApple, Inc8.16%7.49%0.67%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.21%10.51%6.30%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 376.29%5.57%0.72%
WMTWalmart, Inc.2.69%4.55%1.86%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc2.66%4.09%1.43%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.49%4.09%1.60%
COSTCostco Wholesale Corp.2.01%4.24%2.23%
METAMeta Platform Inc2.97%2.76%0.21%
SHOP:CAShopify Inc.0.85%4.58%3.73%
TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#5855580.75%3.39%2.64%

57.9% of UBIQ is already inside QQQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QQQUBIQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or UBIQ?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while UBIQ charges 0.49%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and UBIQ?

57.9% of UBIQ's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 57.9% of UBIQ's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 24 in UBIQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or UBIQ?

QQQ yields 0.43% while UBIQ yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is UBIQ better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.