SCHD vs UCYB
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
Which is better, SCHD or UCYB?
Large Cap Value against Trading-Leveraged Equity.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. UCYB led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | UCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.95% |
| AUM | $111.6B | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.24% | 1.24% |
| Holdings | 206 | 5 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8%Best | 47.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.9%Best | -62.9% |
| $10,000 over 5.7 years | $18,371 | $27,527Best |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | ProShares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Jan 19, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 21 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. SCHD has data through Nov 2, 2026 and UCYB through Oct 12, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 5.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 21, 2021 to Oct 12, 2026 (5.7 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UCYB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 47.2% compared with 14.8% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.9% for SCHD and -62.9% for UCYB. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.22. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while UCYB charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $95 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.24% against 1.24% for UCYB.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCHD and UCYB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or UCYB?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while UCYB charges 0.95%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $89 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, SCHD or UCYB?
UCYB has been the more volatile fund at 47.2% annualized versus 14.8% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -16.9% vs UCYB -62.9%.
Should I hold both SCHD and UCYB?
SCHD and UCYB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.22, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or UCYB?
SCHD yields 3.24% while UCYB yields 1.24%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is UCYB better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. UCYB led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.