UCYB vs VTI
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. UCYB delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UCYB | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $9M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.53% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +63.49% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +54.19% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +45.46% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.30% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 47.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 19, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
UCYB vs VTI Performance
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (UCYB) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UCYB returned +54.19% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, UCYB is up 63.49% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, UCYB compounded at +45.46% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +14.30% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, UCYB has the edge at +15.14% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UCYB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 47.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.9% for UCYB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UCYB charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UCYB currently yields 1.53% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UCYB or VTI?
UCYB has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, UCYB or VTI?
Over the past year UCYB returned +54.19% vs +22.35% for VTI, so UCYB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), UCYB annualized +15.14% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, UCYB or VTI?
UCYB has been the more volatile fund at 47.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: UCYB -62.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both UCYB and VTI?
UCYB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, UCYB or VTI?
UCYB yields 1.53% while VTI yields 1.07%, so UCYB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.