UCYB vs VOO
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. UCYB delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UCYB | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $7M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.58% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +91.11% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +73.62% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +51.98% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +18.08% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 48.2% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 19, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
UCYB vs VOO Performance
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (UCYB) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UCYB returned +73.62% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, UCYB is up 91.11% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, UCYB compounded at +51.98% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +18.08% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, UCYB has the edge at +18.49% annualized vs +13.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UCYB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 48.2% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.9% for UCYB and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UCYB charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UCYB currently yields 1.58% against 1.09% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UCYB or VOO?
UCYB has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, UCYB or VOO?
Over the past year UCYB returned +73.62% vs +22.02% for VOO, so UCYB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), UCYB annualized +18.49% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, UCYB or VOO?
UCYB has been the more volatile fund at 48.2% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: UCYB -62.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both UCYB and VOO?
UCYB and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, UCYB or VOO?
UCYB yields 1.58% while VOO yields 1.09%, so UCYB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.