UCYB vs VXUS
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. UCYB delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UCYB | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $7M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.58% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +82.21% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +75.11% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +49.69% | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +17.81% | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 47.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 19, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
UCYB vs VXUS Performance
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (UCYB) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UCYB returned +75.11% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, UCYB is up 82.21% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Over three years, UCYB compounded at +49.69% per year against +19.53% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +17.81% and +9.03% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, UCYB has the edge at +17.50% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UCYB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 47.9% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.9% for UCYB and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.33. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UCYB charges 0.95% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $5 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UCYB currently yields 1.58% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UCYB or VXUS?
UCYB has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $90 per year of difference.
Which performed better, UCYB or VXUS?
Over the past year UCYB returned +75.11% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so UCYB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), UCYB annualized +17.50% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, UCYB or VXUS?
UCYB has been the more volatile fund at 47.9% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: UCYB -62.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both UCYB and VXUS?
UCYB and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.33, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, UCYB or VXUS?
UCYB yields 1.58% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.