SCHD vs XJR
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
Which is better, SCHD or XJR?
Large Cap Value against Small Cap Blend.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. XJR is less concentrated, with 9.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | XJR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.12% |
| AUM | $112.1B | $211M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.00% | 0.95% |
| Holdings | 103 | 602 |
| YTD Return | +25.84%Best | +14.76% |
| 1Y Return | +30.18%Best | +16.44% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.08%Best | +14.51% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.97%Best | +6.27% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1%Best | 20.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.9%Best | -27.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,083Best | $13,554 |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.8% | 9.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Sep 22, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 24, 2020 to Sep 15, 2026 (6 years).
SCHD vs XJR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6 years both funds cover.
SCHD vs XJR Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year SCHD returned +30.18% while XJR returned +16.44%. Year to date, SCHD is up 25.84% versus a gain of 14.76% for XJR.
Over three years, SCHD compounded at +16.08% per year against +14.51% for XJR; over five years the annualized figures are +9.97% and +6.27% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +15.17% annualized vs +13.70%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XJR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.4% compared with 15.1% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.9% for SCHD and -27.1% for XJR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while XJR charges 0.12%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $12 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.00% against 0.95% for XJR.
Holdings Overlap
1.3% of SCHD's money is in holdings XJR also owns. 2.9% of XJR's money is in holdings SCHD also owns.
XJR and SCHD share little of their money.
23 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 524 in XJR, against full books of 103 and 602.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 489 positions for XJR that do not appear in our book for SCHD (93.8% of the fund), and 77 for SCHD that do not appear in XJR (98.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCHD | Weight in XJR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KFYKorn Ferry | 0.11% | 0.29% | 0.18% |
| RHIRobert Half International Inc. | 0.11% | 0.29% | 0.18% |
| CWENClearway Energy, Inc., Class C | 0.09% | 0.25% | 0.16% |
| MCMoelis & Co_None_0 | 0.12% | 0.19% | 0.07% |
| CVBFCvb Financial Corp. | 0.09% | 0.17% | 0.08% |
| APAMArtisan Partners Asset Management, Inc. | 0.07% | 0.19% | 0.12% |
| CNSCohen & Steers Inc | 0.05% | 0.14% | 0.09% |
| IPARInter Parfums Inc | 0.05% | 0.14% | 0.09% |
| BANRBanner Corp_None_0 | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.05% |
| NSPInsperity Inc | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.07% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCHD and XJR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or XJR?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while XJR charges 0.12%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCHD or XJR?
Over the past year SCHD returned +30.18% vs +16.44% for XJR, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), SCHD annualized +15.17% vs +13.70% for XJR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCHD or XJR?
XJR has been the more volatile fund at 20.4% annualized versus 15.1% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -16.9% vs XJR -27.1%.
Should I hold both SCHD and XJR?
SCHD and XJR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and XJR?
2.9% of XJR's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 2.9% of XJR's is in holdings SCHD also owns. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 524 in XJR.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or XJR?
SCHD yields 3.00% while XJR yields 0.95%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XJR better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. XJR is less concentrated, with 9.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.