VTI vs ZINC
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Zacks Income ETF
Which is better, VTI or ZINC?
Large Cap Blend against All Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | ZINC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.55% |
| AUM | $666.9B | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 54 |
| YTD Return | +13.95%Best | +6.21% |
| 1Y Return | +21.44% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.10% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.77% | - |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Zacks |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | All Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Jun 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
VTI vs ZINC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
VTI vs ZINC Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Zacks Income ETF (ZINC) is an ETF from Zacks. Year to date, VTI is up 13.95% versus a gain of 6.21% for ZINC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while ZINC charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $55 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 0.00% for ZINC.
Holdings Overlap
At least 61.8% of ZINC's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
30 positions in common, counted across the 2,787 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 51 in ZINC, against full books of 3,543 and 54.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VTI | Weight in ZINC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ESEversource Energ | 0.04% | 5.64% | 5.60% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.11% | 4.21% | 3.10% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 0.17% | 4.74% | 4.57% |
| EIXEdison Intl | 0.04% | 3.57% | 3.53% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.43% | 3.07% | 2.64% |
| TROWT Rowe Price Grp | 0.03% | 3.11% | 3.08% |
| FITBFifth Third Bancorp | 0.07% | 2.84% | 2.77% |
| UNMUnum Group | 0.02% | 2.86% | 2.84% |
| UBSIUnited Bankshares Inc/Wv | 0.00% | 2.67% | 2.67% |
| VLOValero Energy | 0.11% | 2.53% | 2.42% |
61.8% of ZINC is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or ZINC?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ZINC charges 0.55%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and ZINC?
At least 61.8% of ZINC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 2,787 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 51 in ZINC.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or ZINC?
VTI yields 1.07% while ZINC yields 0.00%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZINC better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.