VOO vs ZINC
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Zacks Income ETF
Which is better, VOO or ZINC?
Large Cap Blend against All Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ZINC is less concentrated, with 33.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | ZINC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.55% |
| AUM | $997.4B | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.04% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 509 | 54 |
| YTD Return | +12.37%Best | +3.97% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.37% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.49% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.6% | 33.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Zacks |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | All Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Jun 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
VOO vs ZINC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
VOO vs ZINC Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Zacks Income ETF (ZINC) is an ETF from Zacks. Year to date, VOO is up 12.37% versus a gain of 3.97% for ZINC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while ZINC charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $55 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.04% against 0.00% for ZINC.
Holdings Overlap
6.2% of VOO's money is in holdings ZINC also owns. 67.7% of ZINC's money is in holdings VOO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
34 positions in common, counted across the 494 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 55 in ZINC, against full books of 509 and 54.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 14 positions for ZINC that do not appear in our book for VOO (18.2% of the fund), and 453 for VOO that do not appear in ZINC (93.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VOO | Weight in ZINC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.46% | 4.28% | 2.82% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 0.18% | 4.56% | 4.38% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.57% | 3.34% | 2.77% |
| VLOValero Energy | 0.14% | 3.02% | 2.88% |
| TROWT Rowe Price Grp | 0.04% | 2.95% | 2.91% |
| GISGeneral Mills In | 0.03% | 2.86% | 2.83% |
| PNWPinnacle West Capital Corp. | 0.02% | 2.85% | 2.83% |
| FITBFifth Third Bancorp | 0.08% | 2.69% | 2.61% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.00% | 1.54% | 0.54% |
| FFord Motor Credit | 0.09% | 2.44% | 2.35% |
67.7% of ZINC is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or ZINC?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ZINC charges 0.55%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and ZINC?
67.7% of ZINC's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 67.7% of ZINC's is in holdings VOO also owns. They hold 34 positions in common, counted across the 494 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 55 in ZINC.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or ZINC?
VOO yields 1.04% while ZINC yields 0.00%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZINC better than VOO?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ZINC is less concentrated, with 33.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.