SCYB vs VOO
Schwab High Yield Bond ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCYB offers more diversification with 1463 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCYB | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.7B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.90% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 1,838 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +1.84% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.85% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.98% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SCYB vs VOO Performance
Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCYB returned +4.85% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, SCYB is up 1.84% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, SCYB compounded at +7.98% per year against +21.55% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs +7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 4.4% for SCYB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.9% for SCYB and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCYB charges 0.03% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, SCYB currently yields 6.90% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SCYB and VOO share 1 holdings out of 1967 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCYB | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MGM | 0.08% | 0.01% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCYB or VOO?
SCYB has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VOO charges 0.03%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCYB or VOO?
Over the past year SCYB returned +4.85% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), SCYB annualized +7.95% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCYB or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 4.4% for SCYB. Worst drawdown: SCYB -4.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SCYB and VOO?
SCYB and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SCYB and VOO?
SCYB and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1967 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCYB or VOO?
SCYB yields 6.90% while VOO yields 1.09%, so SCYB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.