SCYB vs VOO

SCYB vs VOO

Which is better, SCYB or VOO?

High Yield Bond against Large Cap Blend.

VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSCYBVOO
Expense Ratio0.03%Tie0.03%Tie
AUM$2.8B$997.4B
Dividend Yield6.89%1.04%
Holdings1,841509
YTD Return+1.73%+11.55%Best
1Y Return+3.58%+17.54%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+7.80%+20.71%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.80%
Volatility (annualized)4.5%Best12.8%
Max Drawdown-4.9%Best-18.7%
$10,000 over 3.2 years$12,683$17,927Best
Fund FamilyCharles Schwab Asset ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
StyleHigh Yield BondLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 11, 2023Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 11, 2023 to Sep 10, 2026 (3.2 years).

SCYB vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.

SCYB vs VOO Performance

Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCYB returned +3.58% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, SCYB is up 1.73% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.

Over three years, SCYB compounded at +7.80% per year against +20.71% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.8% compared with 4.5% for SCYB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.9% for SCYB and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SCYB charges 0.03% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, SCYB currently yields 6.89% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 1,430 holdings in SCYB and 505 in VOO, totalling 76.0% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 1,430 positions we hold weights for in SCYB and 505 in VOO, against full books of 1,841 and 509.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of SCYB and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

SCYBVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SCYB or VOO?

SCYB has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VOO charges 0.03%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, SCYB or VOO?

Over the past year SCYB returned +3.58% vs +17.54% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, SCYB or VOO?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.8% annualized versus 4.5% for SCYB. Worst drawdown: SCYB -4.9% vs VOO -18.7%.

Should I hold both SCYB and VOO?

SCYB and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, SCYB or VOO?

SCYB yields 6.89% while VOO yields 1.04%, so SCYB currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than SCYB?

VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.