SECT vs VTI
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SECT or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SECT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.8B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.74% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 11 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +10.07% | +12.28%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.84% | +16.78%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.53% | +20.89%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.79% | +11.94%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 16.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -50.1% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,459 | $17,576Best |
| Top 10 Weight | - | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Main Management ETF Advisors, LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 5, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 16, 2016 to Sep 17, 2026 (9.8 years).
SECT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.8 years both funds cover.
SECT vs VTI Performance
Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) is an ETF from Main Management ETF Advisors, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SECT returned +14.84% while VTI returned +16.78%. Year to date, SECT is up 10.07% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.
Over three years, SECT compounded at +18.53% per year against +20.89% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.79% and +11.94% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +6.85%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SECT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 16.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.1% for SECT and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SECT charges 0.69% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $3 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SECT currently yields 0.74% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 9 holdings in SECT and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 100.0% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 9 positions we hold weights for in SECT and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 11 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SECT (97.5% of the fund), and 9 for SECT that do not appear in VTI (100.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SECT and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SECT or VTI?
SECT has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $66 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SECT or VTI?
Over the past year SECT returned +14.84% vs +16.78% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), SECT annualized +6.85% vs +13.61% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SECT or VTI?
SECT has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 16.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SECT -50.1% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both SECT and VTI?
SECT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SECT or VTI?
SECT yields 0.74% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SECT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.