SFLO vs VTI
VictoryShares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SFLO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SFLO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $644M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.79% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 201 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +34.73% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +41.30% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -26.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 21, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
SFLO vs VTI Performance
VictoryShares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SFLO returned +41.30% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, SFLO is up 34.73% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SFLO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.6% for SFLO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SFLO charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SFLO currently yields 0.79% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SFLO and VTI share 149 holdings out of 2833 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SFLO or VTI?
SFLO has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SFLO or VTI?
Over the past year SFLO returned +41.30% vs +22.39% for VTI, so SFLO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), SFLO annualized +19.61% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SFLO or VTI?
SFLO has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SFLO -26.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SFLO and VTI?
SFLO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SFLO and VTI?
SFLO and VTI share 149 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2833 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SFLO or VTI?
SFLO yields 0.79% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.