SFYF vs VXUS
SoFi Social 50 ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SFYF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $39M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +14.21% | +15.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.28% | +26.32% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +32.38% | +19.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.56% | +9.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | SoFi | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 7, 2019 | Jan 26, 2011 |
SFYF vs VXUS Performance
SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) is a ETF from SoFi and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SFYF returned +25.28% while VXUS returned +26.32%. Year to date, SFYF is up 14.21% versus a gain of 15.24% for VXUS.
Over three years, SFYF compounded at +32.38% per year against +19.85% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +11.56% and +9.23% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, SFYF has the edge at +17.91% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SFYF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.1% for SFYF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SFYF charges 0.29% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $5 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SFYF currently yields 0.36% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
SFYF and VXUS share 2 holdings out of 7910 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SFYF or VXUS?
SFYF has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $24 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SFYF or VXUS?
Over the past year SFYF returned +25.28% vs +26.32% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), SFYF annualized +17.91% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SFYF or VXUS?
SFYF has been the more volatile fund at 29.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: SFYF -56.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both SFYF and VXUS?
SFYF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SFYF and VXUS?
SFYF and VXUS share 2 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7910 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SFYF or VXUS?
SFYF yields 0.36% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.