SIMS vs SPY
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Which is better, SIMS or SPY?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SIMS is less concentrated, with 30.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SIMS | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.09%Best |
| AUM | $8M | $804.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.58% | 0.98% |
| Holdings | 55 | 505 |
| YTD Return | -0.09% | +13.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.87% | +18.19%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.39% | +23.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.34% | +13.21%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.6% | 16.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.0% | -34.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,831 | $18,596Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 30.8%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 18, 2017 | Jan 22, 1993 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 27, 2017 to Sep 25, 2026 (8.7 years).
SIMS vs SPY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.7 years both funds cover.
SIMS vs SPY Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year SIMS returned +3.87% while SPY returned +18.19%. Year to date, SIMS is down 0.09% versus a gain of 13.51% for SPY.
Over three years, SIMS compounded at +11.39% per year against +23.29% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are -0.34% and +13.21% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +13.84% annualized vs +4.79%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SIMS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.6% compared with 16.4% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.0% for SIMS and -34.1% for SPY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SIMS charges 0.45% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $9 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SIMS currently yields 0.58% against 0.98% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
28.1% of SIMS's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 2.3% of SPY's money is in holdings SIMS also owns.
SIMS and SPY share little of their money.
15 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in SIMS and 504 in SPY, against full books of 55 and 505.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 481 positions for SPY that do not appear in our book for SIMS (97.0% of the fund), and 33 for SIMS that do not appear in SPY (63.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SIMS | Weight in SPY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.62% | 1.52% | 1.10% |
| VLTOVeralto Corp | 3.25% | 0.04% | 3.21% |
| XYLXylem,Inc. | 2.80% | 0.04% | 2.76% |
| JCIJohnson Controls Intl Plc | 2.70% | 0.13% | 2.57% |
| PNRPentair Plc Ordinary Shares | 2.30% | 0.01% | 2.29% |
| GNRCGenerac Holdings, Inc. | 2.11% | 0.02% | 2.09% |
| ROPRoper Technologies Inc. | 2.04% | 0.06% | 1.98% |
| AMEAmetek Inc | 1.70% | 0.08% | 1.62% |
| TELTE Connectivity PLC Common Stock | 1.63% | 0.09% | 1.54% |
| DDDupont De Nemours, Inc. | 1.60% | 0.03% | 1.57% |
28.1% of SIMS is already inside SPY.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SIMS or SPY?
SIMS has an expense ratio of 0.45% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SIMS or SPY?
Over the past year SIMS returned +3.87% vs +18.19% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), SIMS annualized +4.79% vs +13.84% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SIMS or SPY?
SIMS has been the more volatile fund at 24.6% annualized versus 16.4% for SPY. Worst drawdown: SIMS -44.0% vs SPY -34.1%.
Should I hold both SIMS and SPY?
SIMS and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SIMS and SPY?
28.1% of SIMS's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 2.3% of SPY's is in holdings SIMS also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in SIMS and 504 in SPY.
Which pays a higher dividend, SIMS or SPY?
SIMS yields 0.58% while SPY yields 0.98%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPY better than SIMS?
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SIMS is less concentrated, with 30.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.