SKOR vs VOO
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. SKOR offers more diversification with 1608 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SKOR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $729M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.66% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 1,661 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +0.15% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.42% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.88% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.59% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.5% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Flexshares Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2014 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SKOR vs VOO Performance
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) is a ETF from Flexshares Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SKOR returned +2.42% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, SKOR is up 0.15% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, SKOR compounded at +5.88% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +1.59% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +1.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 4.5% for SKOR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.0% for SKOR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SKOR charges 0.15% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SKOR currently yields 4.66% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SKOR and VOO share 4 holdings out of 2109 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SKOR or VOO?
SKOR has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SKOR or VOO?
Over the past year SKOR returned +2.42% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), SKOR annualized +1.44% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SKOR or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 4.5% for SKOR. Worst drawdown: SKOR -16.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SKOR and VOO?
SKOR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SKOR and VOO?
SKOR and VOO share 4 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2109 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SKOR or VOO?
SKOR yields 4.66% while VOO yields 1.09%, so SKOR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.