SLVI vs VOO
NEOS Silver High Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SLVI or VOO?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SLVI led over the full window, VOO over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLVI | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.78% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $8M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 1.28% | 1.05% |
| Holdings | 1 | 519 |
| YTD Return | -17.74% | +11.31%Best |
| 1Y Return | -17.74% | +13.49%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.61% |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 14.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -67.2% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 16.2 years | $24,732,874Best | $74,314 |
| Fund Family | NEOS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 6, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 16.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 14, 2010 to Nov 13, 2026 (16.2 years).
SLVI vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SLVI vs VOO Performance
NEOS Silver High Income ETF (SLVI) is an ETF from NEOS and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SLVI returned -17.74% while VOO returned +13.49%. Year to date, SLVI is down 17.74% versus a gain of 11.31% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.2% for SLVI and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLVI charges 0.78% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $78 vs $3 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLVI currently yields 1.28% against 1.05% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in SLVI and 506 in VOO, totalling 18.2% and 100.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in SLVI and 506 in VOO, against full books of 1 and 519.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SLVI and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLVI or VOO?
SLVI has an expense ratio of 0.78% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $75 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SLVI or VOO?
Over the past year SLVI returned -17.74% vs +13.49% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), SLVI annualized +61.98% vs +13.18% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLVI or VOO?
SLVI yields 1.28% while VOO yields 1.05%, so SLVI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SLVI?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SLVI led over the full window, VOO over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.